Comparing Clinical Responses to Using One Burr Hole and Two Burr Holes to Treat Chronic Subdural Hematoma
More details
Hide details
Department of Neurosurgery, Arak University of Medical Sciences, Arak, IRAN
Department of Anesthesiology, Arak University of Medical Sciences, Arak, IRAN
Online publish date: 2018-02-03
Publish date: 2018-02-03
Eurasian J Anal Chem 2018;13(3):em19
The therapeutic strategies currently used to treat chronic subdural hematoma (CSDH) include various methods such as craniotomy and twist drill or utilizing Burr hole. The present research seeks to make a clinical comparison between using one burr hole and two burr holes to treat CSDH. This is a randomized, double-blind clinical trial conducted on 70 patients suffering from CSDH candidated for using burr hole. The participants were divided into two equal groups and underwent treatment with 1 burr hole or 2 burr holes. The primary and secondary outcome variables were compared across the two groups prior to and 48 hours following the operation. A total number of 5 death cases were (7.14%) were reported among patients. 2 patients (5.71%) were in the 1 burr hole group, while 3 (8.57%) were in the 2 burr hole group (P = 0.514). The need for undergoing a secondary operation in the 2 burr holes group (1 case, i.e. 2.85%) was significantly less than what was reported in the other group (6 cases, i.e. 17.14%) (P = 0.012). The mean time of hospitalization (1 burr hole: 4.98, 2 burr holes: 3.1, P = 0.001), the pneumosephalus levels 48 hours following the operation (1 burr hole: 9.38, 2 burr holes: 5.91, P = 0.012) and hematoma levels 48 hours following the operation (1 burr hole: 41.57, 2 burr holes: 30.85, P = 0.0001) in the 2 burr holes group were significantly less than what were reported in the other group. 48 hours after the operation, the hematoma volume (1 burr hole: P= 0.031, 2 burr holes: P= 0.002) in both groups exhibited a significant reduction compared to what was observed before the operation. Using 1 or 2 burr holes are quite useful methods to treat CSDH patients. However, the clinical outcome of those patients in the 2 burr holes group was much more favorable.
1. Regan JM, Worley E, Shelburne C, Pullarkat R, Watson JC. Burr hole washout versus craniotomy for chronic subdural hematoma: patient outcome and cost analysis. PLoS One. 2015;10(1):e0115085. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0115085.
2. Chen JC, Levy ML. Causes, epidemiology, and risk factors of chronic subdural hematoma. Neurosurg Clin N Am. 2000;11(3):399-406.
3. Ledić D, Girotto D, Pal S, Kolbah B. Risk factors for subdural bleeding in elderly population. Coll Antropol. 2014;38(4):1195-8.
4. Massobrio L, Rosa GM, Montecucco F, Valbus A. Treatment with apixaban in a patient with recent chronic subdural haematoma: a case report. Swiss Med Wkly. 2015;145:w14048. https://doi.org/10.4414/smw.2015.14048.
5. Baechli H, Nordmann A, Bucher HC, Gratzl O. Demographics and prevalent risk factors of chronic subdural haematoma: results of a large single-center cohort study. Neurosurg Rev. 2004;27(4):263-6. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10143-004-0337-6.
6. Lee JY, Ebel H, Ernestus RI, Klug N. Various surgical treatments of chronic subdural hematoma and outcome in 172 patients: is membranectomy necessary. Surg Neurol. 2004;61(6):523- 7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surneu.2003.10.026.
7. Allahdini F, Afkhamzadeh A, Amirjamshidi A, Delpisheh A. Factors Affecting the Outcomes of Patient's Suffering from Chronic Subdural Hematoma after Surgery by Burr-hole Hole-Drainage Method; a Cross Sectional Survey. Iranian surgery journal. 2010;18(3):40-51.
8. Weigel R, Schmiedek P, Krauss JK. Outcome of contemporary surgery for chronic subdural haematoma: evidence based review. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2003;74(7):937-43. https://doi.org/10.1136/jnnp.74.7.937.
9. Lega BC, Danish SF, Malhotra NR, Sonnad SS, Stein SC. Choosing the best operation for chronic subdural hematoma: a decision analysis. J Neurosurg. 2010;113(3):615-21. https://doi.org/10.3171/2009.9.JNS08825.
10. Taussky P, Fandino J, Landolt H. Number of burr holes as independent predictor of postoperative recurrence in chronic subdural haematoma. Br J Neurosurg. 2008;22(2):279-282. https://doi.org/10.1080/02688690701818885.
11. Kawamata T, Takeshita M, Kubo O, Izawa M, Kagawa M, Takakura K. Management of intracranial hemorrhage associated with anticoagulant therapy. Surg Neurol. 1995;44(5):438-43. https://doi.org/10.1016/0090-3019(95)00249-9.
12. Robinson RG. Chronic subdural hematoma: surgical management in 133 patients. J Neurosurg. 1984;61(2):263-8. https://doi.org/10.3171/jns.1984.61.2.0263.
13. Drapkin AJ. Chronic subdural hematoma: pathophysiological basis for treatment. Br J Neurosurg. 1991;5(5):467-73. https://doi.org/10.3109/02688699108998475.
14. Tokmak M, Aras AB, Baltepe Altıok I, Guven M, Coşar M. Chronic Spinal Epidural Hematoma in an Adult. European Journal of General Medicine. 2015;12(3):267-70. https://doi.org/10.15197/ejgm.01430.
15. Htwe O, Naicker AS, Pei TS. Spinal epidural hematoma due to anticoagulant therapy: a case report and literature review. European Journal of General Medicine. 2016;13(3):61–2. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejgm/81908.