Economic Sectors Development Evaluation in Innovations Triple-Helix Model
 
More details
Hide details
1
Kazan National Research Technological University, RUSSIA
2
Gzhel State University, RUSSIA
3
RUDN University (Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia), RUSSIA
4
Plekhanov Russian University of Economics, RUSSIA
5
Kazan State University of Architecture and Engineering, RUSSIA
6
Ulyanovsk State Agrarian University named after P.A. Stolypin, RUSSIA
CORRESPONDING AUTHOR
Svetlana S. Kudryavtseva   

Department of Logistics and Management, Kazan National Research Technological University, Kazan, Russia
Online publish date: 2017-10-10
Publish date: 2017-10-10
 
Eurasian J Anal Chem 2017;12(Interdisciplinary Perspective on Sciences 7b):1399–1404
KEYWORDS
ABSTRACT
The paper relevance is related to the need to develop new approaches to the innovative economy management. The paper purpose is to develop innovative development analytical model in the economic sectors context based on open innovations’ theoretical concepts study and systematization. The paper presents the characteristics for innovative activity system-forming elements, including the innovative infrastructure at the meso-level. An innovation triple helix model is suggested by economic activity types in national innovation systems on economic and mathematical simulation basis. The paper materials can be used to develop innovation activities forecasts of science, business and the state.
 
REFERENCES (17)
1.
Glazyev, S. Yu. (2017). The crisis and the window of opportunity. Special Forces of Russia, 8(250). Direct access: http://www.specnaz.ru/articles....
 
2.
Kingston, W. (1984). The Political Economy of Innovation (Studies in Industrial Organization). London: Springer.
 
3.
Patel, P., & Pavitt, K. (1994). The Nature and Economic Importance of National Innovation Systems. Paris: OECD.
 
4.
Metcalfe, S. (1995). The Economic Foundations of Technology Policy: Equilibrium and Evolutionary Perspectives. Blackwell Publishers: Cambridge.
 
5.
Yakovec, Y. V. (2004). Epochal innovations of the XXI century. Moscow: Economics.
 
6.
Lundvall, B. A., Intaracumnerd, P., & Vang, J. (2006). Asia’a innovation system in transition. New York: Edward Elgar.
 
7.
Leydesdorff, L., & Van den Besselaar (1994). Evolutionary Economics and Chaos Theory: New Directions in. New York: Springer.
 
8.
Etzkowitz, H. (2002). Incubation of incubators: innovation as a triple helix of university-industrygovernment networks. Science and Public Policy, 29(2), 115-128.
 
9.
West, J., & Gallagher, S. (2006). Challenges of open innovation: the paradox of firm investment in open-source software. R&D Management, 36(3), 319-331.
 
10.
Kristensen, K., & Skott, E. (2008). What is the next? Theory of innovation as a tool for the prediction of industry changes. Мoscow: Alpina business book.
 
11.
Shinkevich, A. I., Kudryavtseva, S. S., Razdrokov, E. N., Lushchik, I. V., Vodolazhskaya, E. L., Ostanina, S. Sh., & Sharafutdinova, M. M. (2016). Method for Assessing of the Level of National Innovation Systems Openness from the Institutional Approach Perspective. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 9, 10505-10515.
 
12.
Shinkevich, A. I., Kudryavtseva, S. S., Ivanov, G. G., Korotun, O. N., Ishmuradova, I. I., Gainullina, R. R., & Ostanina, S. Sh. (2017). Research and Technological Capacity of Russia as an Indicator of Knowledge Economy Growth. International Journal of Advanced Biotechnology and Research, 1, 156-163.
 
13.
Shinkevich, A. I., & Ivanova, R. P. (2017). Estimation Technique of Integration Processes in Innovation. Eurasian Journal of Analytical Chemistry, 12, 509-520.
 
14.
Zhou, C. (2014). Government-pulled triple helix model for regional innovation in China. Conference on The Triple Helix Paradigm for Development, 17-19 Sep., Bristol.
 
15.
Etzkowitz, H. (2011). Triple helix. Universities - enterprises - the state. Innovation in action. Publishing house of Tomsk state university of Management Systems and radio electronics, 4, 10-18.
 
16.
Chesbrough, H. (2007). Open innovation: creating profitable technologies. Moscow: Generation.
 
17.
Torkkeli, M., Kok, K., & Savickaya, I. (2009). Innovation management in Russia and concept of «Open innovation»: the first results of the study. Innovations, 11, 89-95.
 
eISSN:1306-3057