Efficiency of Multi Walled Carbon Nanotubes for Removing Direct Blue 71 from Aqueous Solutions
More details
Hide details
Research Center for Environmental Pollutants, Qom University of Medical Sciences, Qom, IRAN
Department of Environmental Health Engineering, Faculty of Health, Kashan University of Medical Sciences, Kashan, IRAN
Department of Environmental Health Engineering, School of Public Health, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, IRAN
Environmental Health Engineering Research Center, Department of Environmental Health, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, IRAN
Department of Environmental Health Engineering, School of Public Health, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, IRAN
Social Determinants of Health Research Center, Yasuj University of Medical Sciences, Yasuj, IRAN
Department of Environmental Health Engineering, School of Public Health, Shahroud University of Medical Sciences, Shahroud, IRAN
Online publish date: 2018-02-02
Publish date: 2018-02-02
Eurasian J Anal Chem 2018;13(3):em13
Dye wastewater produced from industrial activity is usually toxic, resistant to biodegradation and persistent in the environment. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficiency of multiwalled carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs) for decolorization of Direct Blue 71 (DB71). In this experimental study, the effect of various variables including contact time, solution pH, adsorbent dose, and initial dye concentration was evaluated in a batch reactor. The adsorption and kinetic models were evaluated to explain the adsorbed dye and dynamic reaction. The results of this study showed that the efficiency of dye removal increased, as the contact time and adsorbent dose increased, but as pH and initial dye concentration increased, removal efficiency decreased. The maximum efficiency of Direct Blue 71 removal was observed at acidic solution (pH=3), contact time of 90 minutes, adsorbent dose of 0.6 g/l and initial dye concentration of 25 mg/l. The adsorption of direct blue 71 best fitted the Langmuir isotherm (R2=0.87) and pseudo first order kinetic equation (R2=0.99). According to the results obtained, multiwalled nanotubes was offered as an effective adsorbent for removing direct blue 71.
1. Méndez-Paz D. Anaerobic treatment of azo dye Acid Orange 7 under fed-batch and continuous conditions. Water research. 2005;39(5):771-8.
2. Gong JL. Removal of cationic dyes from aqueous solution using magnetic multi-wall carbon nanotube nanocomposite as adsorbent. Journal of hazardous materials. 2009;164(2):1517-22.
3. Foroughi-Dahr M. Adsorption characteristics of Congo red from aqueous solution onto tea waste. Chemical Engineering Communications. 2015;202(2):181-93.
4. Shirmardi M. Application of oxidated multi walled carbon nanotubes as a new adsorbent for the removal of Acid red 18 from aqueous solution. J North Khorasan Univ Med Sci. 2012;4(3):335-46.
5. Solmaz SK. Colour and COD removal from textile effluent by coagulation and advanced oxidation processes. Coloration Technology. 2006;122(2):102-9.
6. Aghamirlou HM. Heavy metals determination in honey samples using inductively coupled plasma-optical emission spectrometry. Journal of Environmental Health Science and Engineering. 2015;13(39):1-8.
7. Haghighi SA. Survey of corrosion and silting potential in drinking water of urban distribution system during one year period a case study. International Journal of Pharmacy & Technology. 2015;7(3):9701-8.
8. Lucas MS. Decolorization of the azo dye Reactive Black 5 by Fenton and photo-Fenton oxidation. Dyes and Pigments. 2006;71(3):236-44.
9. Neppolian B. Solar/UV-induced photocatalytic degradation of three commercial textile dyes. Journal of hazardous materials. 2002;89(2):303-17.
10. Konstantinou IK. TiO 2-assisted photocatalytic degradation of azo dyes in aqueous solution: kinetic and mechanistic investigations: a review. Applied Catalysis B: Environmental. 2004;49(1):1-14.
11. Dos Santos AB. Review paper on current technologies for decolourisation of textile wastewaters: perspectives for anaerobic biotechnology. Bioresource technology. 2007;98(12):2369-85.
12. Chang MC. An integrated technique using zero-valent iron and UV/H 2 O 2 sequential process for complete decolorization and mineralization of CI Acid Black 24 wastewater. Journal of hazardous materials. 2006;138(3):574-81.
13. Dalvand A, Gholibegloo E, Ganjali MR, Golchinpoor N, Khazaei M, Kamani H, Mahvi AH. Comparison of Moringa stenopetala seed extract as a clean coagulant with Alum and Moringa stenopetala-Alum hybrid coagulant to remove direct dye from Textile Wastewater. Environmental Science and Pollution Research. 2016;23(16):16396-405.
14. Karami MA. Degradation of Reactive Red 198 (RR198) from aqueous solutions by advanced oxidation processes (AOPS): O3, H2O2/O3 and H2O2/ultrasonic. Bulgarian Chemical Communications. 2016;48:43-49.
15. Mirzaei N. Modified natural zeolite using ammonium quaternary based material for Acid red 18 removal from aqueous solution. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering. 2017;5(4):3151-60.
16. Naghan DJ. Parameters effecting on photocatalytic degradation of the phenol from aqueous solutions in the presence of ZnO nanocatalyst under irradiation of UV-C light. Bulgarian Chemical Communications. 2015;47:14-8.
17. Naghan DJ. Efficiency comparison of alum and ferric chloride coagulants in removal of dye and organic material from industrial wastewater-a case study. Bulgarian Chemical Communications. 2015;47:206-210.
18. Hadi M. Using Thomas model to evaluate dye removal from aqueous solutions in fixed-bed columns of activated carbon. Journal of Water and wastewater. 2011;1:23-34.
19. Bazrafshan E. Evaluation of color removal of Methylene blue from aqueous solutions using plant stem ash of Persica. J North Khorasan Univ Med Sci. 2012;4(4):523-32.
20. Malakootian M. Fluoride removal using Regenerated Spent Bleaching Earth (RSBE) from groundwater: Case study on Kuhbonan water. Desalination. 2011;277(1):244-9.
21. Malakootian M. Evaluating the effectiveness of modified pumice in fluoride removal from water. Asian Journal of Chemistry. 2011;23(8):3691.
22. Ren X. Carbon nanotubes as adsorbents in environmental pollution management: a review. Chemical Engineering Journal. 2011;170(2):395-410.
23. Rabbani D. Green approach to wastewater treatment by application of Rosa damascena waste as nano-biosorbent. Journal of Environmental Science and Technology. 2016;9(1):121-30.
24. Rahmani H. Tinidazol antibiotic degradation in aqueous solution by zero valent iron nanoparticles and hydrogen peroxide in the presence of ultrasound radiation. Journal of Water Chemistry and Technology. 2014;36(6):317-24.
25. Rezaii Mofrad MR. Removal of methyl orange from synthetic wastewater using nano-MgO and nano-MgO/UV combination. Desalination and Water Treatment. 2016;57(18), 8330-5.
26. Yousefi N. Application of nanofilter in removal of phosphate, fluoride and nitrite from groundwater. Desalination and Water Treatment. 2016;57(25):11782-8.
27. Zadeh AD. COD and color removal from the solid waste leachate using graphen oxide. International Journal of Pharmacy and Technology. 2016;8(2):13995-14005.
28. Ghadiri SK. Adsorption of nitrate onto anionic bio-graphene nanosheet from aqueous solutions: Isotherm and kinetic study. Journal of Molecular Liquids. 2017;242:1111-7.
29. Iijima S. Helical microtubules of graphitic carbon. Nature. 1991;354(6348):56-8.
30. Tan X. Counterion effects of nickel and sodium dodecylbenzene sulfonate adsorption to multiwalled carbon nanotubes in aqueous solution. Carbon. 2008;46(13):1741-50.
31. Long RQ. Carbon nanotubes as superior sorbent for dioxin removal. Journal of the American Chemical Society. 2001;123(9):2058-9.
32. Luo P. Study on the adsorption of Neutral Red from aqueous solution onto halloysite nanotubes. Water research. 2010;44(5):1489-97.
33. Fard RF. Batch kinetics and isotherms for biosorption of cadmium onto biosolids. Desalination and Water Treatment. 2011;28(1-3):69-74.
34. Ebrahimi AA. Efficiency study of nickel (II) and cadmium (II) biosorption by powder of waste activated sludge from aqueous solutions. Iranian Journal of Health and Environment. 2011;3(4):419-30.
35. Malakootian M. Fluoride removal from aqueous solution by pumice: case study on Kuhbonan water. African Journal of Environmental Science and Technology. 2011;5(4):299-306.
36. Fard RF, Bidhendi GN, Azimi AA. Biosorption of nickel from batch reactor using the powder of waste activated sludge. Research Journal of Environmental Sciences. 2011;5(5):461.
37. Ahmadian M. Kinetic study of slaughterhouse wastewater treatment by electrocoagulation using Fe electrodes. Water Science and Technology. 2012;66(4);754-60.
38. Malakootian M. Nickel (II) removal from industrial plating effluent by fenton process. Environmental Engineering and Management Journal. 2015;14(4):837-42.
39. Mirzaei N. Sorption of acid dye by surfactant modificated natural zeolites. Journal of the Taiwan Institute of Chemical Engineers. 2016;59:186-94.
40. Yousefi N. Adsorption of reactive black 5 dye onto modified wheat straw: isotherm and kinetics study 1. Sacha Journal of Environmental Studies. 2011;1(2):81-91.
41. Mishra AK. Study of removal of azo dye by functionalized multi walled carbon nanotubes. Chemical Engineering Journal. 2010;162(3):1026-34.
42. Xue Y. Adsorption removal of reactive dyes from aqueous solution by modified basic oxygen furnace slag: isotherm and kinetic study. Chemical Engineering Journal. 2009;147(2):272-9.
43. Mahvi AH. Removal efficiency of azo dyes from textile effluent using activated carbon made from walnut wood and determination of isotherms of acid red18. Journal of Health. 2010;1(3):7-15.
44. Malakootian M. Evaluating the efficacy of alumina/carbon nanotube hybrid adsorbents in removing Azo Reactive Red 198 and Blue 19 dyes from aqueous solutions. Process Safety and Environmental Protection. 2015;96:125-37.
45. Garg VK. Basic dye (methylene blue) removal from simulated wastewater by adsorption using Indian Rosewood sawdust: a timber industry waste. Dyes and pigments. 2004;63(3):243-50.