Estimation Technique of Integration Processes in Innovation
 
More details
Hide details
1
Kazan National Research Technological University, Kazan, Russia
CORRESPONDING AUTHOR
Alexey I. Shinkevich   

Department of Logistics and Management, Kazan National Research Technological University, Kazan, Russia.
Online publish date: 2017-07-05
Publish date: 2017-07-05
 
Eurasian J Anal Chem 2017;12(A Multidisciplinary Approach to science 5b):509–520
KEYWORDS
ABSTRACT
The relevance of the chosen topic is determined by the need to recognize innovative activities as priority areas of socio-economic development in the face of increasing competition of national and regional innovation systems. The purpose of the article is to develop a theoretical approach to studying the integration space of modern holding structures using key indicators of integration efficiency. The tendencies of innovative activity in realization of joint innovative projects are analyzed. The author's approach with use of key indicators of efficiency of integration processes in a projection of the balanced system of indicators is offered. The materials of the article are of theoretical and practical importance for the development and implementation of federal and regional innovative development programs, as well as in the development of the strategy of state innovation policy.
 
REFERENCES (25)
1.
Kingston, W. (1984). The Political Economy of Innovation (Studies in Industrial Organization). New York: Springer.
 
2.
Patel, P., & Pavitt, K. (1994). The Nature and Economic Importance of National Innovation Systems. OECD. STI Review.
 
3.
Metcalfe, S. (1995). The Economic Foundations of Technology Policy: Equilibrium and Evolutionary Perspectives, in P. Stoneman (ed.), Handbook of the Economics of Innovation and Technological Change, Blackwell Publishers. USA: Cambridge.
 
4.
Yakovec, Y.V. (2004). Epochal innovations of the XXI century. Moscow: Economics.
 
5.
Lundvall, B.A., Intaracumnerd, P. & Vang, J. (2006). Asia’a innovation system in transition. USA New York: Edward Elgar.
 
6.
Druzhinina, S.V. (1991). Problems of integrating science and production in modern conditions. Bulletin of the Leningrad University. Economics, 5, 111-113.
 
7.
Leydesdorff, L. & Besselaar, Van den (1994). Evolutionary Economics and Chaos Theory: New Directions in London and New York. New York: American Institute of Physics, Woodbury.
 
8.
Etzkowitz, H. (2002). Incubation of incubators: innovation as a triple helix of university-industrygovernment networks. Science and Public Policy, 29(2), 115-128.
 
9.
Dezhina, I.G. & Kiseleva, V.V. (2008). State, science and business in the innovation system of Russia. Moskow: IET.
 
10.
Satinsky, D. & Botot, S. (2011). The model of the triple helix in the regional development of Great Britain, the USA and Russia. Innovations, 4, 43-46.
 
11.
Shmatko, A.D. (2014). The development of small innovative enterprises in academic institutions in the conditions of formation of technological platforms. Intellectual property. Industry. Scientific and practical journal, 8, 35-42.
 
12.
Shinkevich, A.I., Kudryavtseva, S.S., Razdrokov, E.N., Lushchik, I.V., Vodolazhskaya, E.L., Ostanina, S.Sh., & Sharafutdinova, M.M. (2016). Method for Assessing of the Level of National Innovation Systems Openness from the Institutional Approach Perspective. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 9, 10505-10515.
 
13.
Galimulina, F.F., Shinkevich, A.I., Ivanov, G.G., Kharisova, R.R., Lushchik, I.V., Ishmuradova, I.I., & Shiryaev, D.V. (2017). Economic Models for Institutional Gaps’ Elimination in the Framework of Innovation. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 12(1), 57-67.
 
14.
Zezyulin, V.V. (2011). Management of the development of the innovative infrastructure of the machine-building holding. Doctorate Dissertation. Moscow: State Academy of Professional Retraining and Advanced Training of Management and Investment Professionals.
 
15.
Gorodnikova, N.V. Gokhberg, L.M., & Ditkovsky, K.A. (2016). Indicators of innovation: a statistical compilation. Moscow: National Research University “Higher School of Economics”.
 
16.
Ishchenko, S.M. (2008). Forms of the effect of synergies from mergers and acquisitions of companies. Bulletin of the Research Center for Corporate Law, Corporate Governance and Venture Investment of Syktyvkar State University, from: http://koet.syktsu.ru/vestnik/....
 
17.
Gvardin, S.V., & Chekun, I.N. (2007). Mergers and acquisitions: an effective strategy for Russia. St. Petersburg: Peter.
 
18.
Maslikov, I.V., & Teslenko, V.V. (2013). Evaluation of the effectiveness of integration processes of enterprises' innovation activity. Scientific notes. OrelSIET Bulletin, 1(7), 45-50.
 
19.
Lyamzin, O.L., Yeremina, S.L., & Dosuzheva, E.E. (2010). Innovative integration aspects of the activities of modern organizations in domestic conditions: monograph. Novosibirsk: Publishing house of Nizhny Novgorod State Technical University.
 
20.
Hagerstrand, T. (1967). Innovation Diffusion as a Spatial Process. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
 
21.
Mensch, G. (1979). Statement in Technology: Innovations Overcome the Depression. New York: Ballinger.
 
22.
Porter, M. (1990). The Competitive Advantage of Nations. NY: The Free Press.
 
23.
Wheelwright, S.C., & Clark, K.B. (1992). Revolutionizing product development: Quantum leaps in speed, efficiency and quality. NY: The Free Press.
 
24.
Leydesdorff, L. (2005). The triple helix model and the study of knowledge-based innovation systems. International Journal of Contemporary Sociology, 42, 1-16.
 
25.
Kudryavtseva, S.S., Shinkevich, A.I., Pavlova, A.V., Chudnovskiy, A.D., Nikolayeva, A.N., Garipova, G.R., Doronina, F.Kh., & Ishmuradova, I.I. (2016). Econometric Methods for Evaluating of Open National Innovative Systems. International journal of economics and financial issues, 6(2), 640-645.
 
eISSN:1306-3057