Infrastructure Projects Management in Service Sector
 
More details
Hide details
1
Kazan National Research Technological University, RUSSIA
2
Ulyanovsk State Agrarian University named after P.A. Stolypin, RUSSIA
3
Plekhanov Russian University of Economics, RUSSIA
4
Saint Petersburg State University of Economics, RUSSIA
5
Kazan State University of Architecture and Engineering, RUSSIA
CORRESPONDING AUTHOR
Kseniya V. Barmina   

Department of Logistics and Management, Kazan National Research Technological University, Kazan, Russia
Online publish date: 2017-10-20
Publish date: 2017-10-20
 
Eurasian J Anal Chem 2017;12(Interdisciplinary Perspective on Sciences 7b):1513–1519
KEYWORDS
ABSTRACT
The urgency of the problem under study is due to the fact that the development and improvement of services sphere acquires special significance and exerts a noticeable influence on the gross domestic product, which is accompanied by new jobs creation and infrastructure development as a whole. At present, infrastructure projects better management is required, since most organizations and enterprises do not develop evenly. The innovative component introduction stimulates the service sector development, and as a result, the national and world economy development. The paper purpose is to explore the scope of Russia’s services in the infrastructure projects management and to identify social and economic activity directions that require development and improvement, as well as to identify the innovative activities specifics and trends in the service sector. The leading method to investigate this problem is the system approach with the conjoint study use aimed at identifying the links that have developed in the service sector within the framework of innovative development. The study structure. The paper presents foreign and Russian interaction practice between science and services sphere, assesses the infrastructure projects effectiveness using the externalities theories, examines innovative and investment activities in the infrastructure development, that is, the authors optimizes the “triple helix” model, including the population as the fourth entity. The service sector development analysis in Russia has been carried out, and recommendations have been developed to improve it. The paper materials are of practical value to the state administration bodies when developing and implementing federal and regional innovative development programs in the service sector, as well as for private entrepreneurs in the infrastructure projects management in the service sector.
 
REFERENCES (22)
1.
Meade, J. (1952). External Economies and Diseconomies in a Competitive Situation. Economic Journal, 62(245), 54-67.
 
2.
Skitovsky, T. (1954). Two Concepts of External Economies. Journal Political Ec., 57, 143-151.
 
3.
Dolan, E. J., & Lindsey D. E. (1991). Market: Microeconomic Model. London: Cengage Learning EMEA.
 
4.
Sraffa, P. (1926). The laws of returns under competitive conditions’. Economic Journal, 36(4), 535–550.
 
5.
Ellis, H., & Fellner, W. (1943). External Economies and Diseconomies. Am. Ec. Rev, 33, 493-511.
 
6.
Samuelson, P. (1958). An exact consumption-loan model of interest, with or without the social contrivance of money. Journal of Political Economy, 66, 467-482.
 
7.
Pareto, V. (1897). The New Theories of Economics. Journal of Political Economy, 5, 485–502.
 
8.
Fisher, S. (1973). A Environmental Externalities and the Anow-Lmd Public Investment Theorem. Am. Ec. Rev, 63(4), 722-725.
 
9.
Etzkowitz, H. (2002). Incubation of incubators: innovation as a triple helix of university-industry government networks. Science and Public Policy, 29(2), 115-128.
 
10.
Leydesdorff, L. (2005). The triple helix model and the study of knowledge-based innovation systems. International Journal of Contemporary Sociology, 42, 1-16.
 
11.
Babkina, E. V., & Sergeev, V. A. (2011). The triple helix of innovation development: the experience of the US and Europe, opportunities for Russia. Innovations, 12(158), 68-78.
 
12.
Satinsky, D., & Botot, S. (2011). The model of the triple helix in the regional development of Great Britain, the USA and Russia. Innovations, 4, 43-46.
 
13.
Shinkevich, A. I., & Galimulina, F. F. (2012) Managing institutional traps within a triple helix model of innovation in the field of chemical technology. Bulletin of Kazan Technological University, 9, 311-312.
 
14.
Pigou, A. C. (1920). The Economics of Welfare. London: Macmillan and Co.
 
15.
Shinkevich, M. V., Misbakhova, C. A., Bashkirtseva, S. A., Fedorova, T. A., Martynova, O. V., & Beloborodova, A. L. (2017). Institutional Factors of Micro, Mezzo and Macro Systems’ Innovative Development. Journal of Advanced Research in Law and Economics, 1(23), 229-236.
 
16.
Russia in figures. (2016). Brief articles colllection. Moscow: Rosstat.
 
17.
Veblen, T. (1984). Theory of idle class (Trans. by S.G. Sorokina). Moscow: Progress.
 
18.
Schumpeter, J. A. (2008). The theory of economic development. Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy. Moscow: Eksmo.
 
19.
North, D., & Thomas, R. (1973). The Rise of the Western World: A New Economic History. Cambridge: Cambridge University Hress.
 
20.
Dezhina, I. G., & Kiseleva, V. V. (2008). State, science and business in the innovation system of Russia. Moscow: IET.
 
21.
Shinkevich, A. I., & Barmina, K. V. (2016) Managing the infrastructure of the city as part of a triple helix model in marketing. Economic Bulletin of the Republic of Tatarstan, 2, 50-55.
 
22.
Galimulina, F. F., Shinkevich, A. I., Ivanov, G. G., Kharisova, R. R., Lushchik, I. V., Ishmuradova, I. I., & Shiryaev, D. V. (2017). Economic Models for Institutional Gaps’ Elimination in the Framework of Innovation. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 12(1), 57-67.
 
eISSN:1306-3057