Innovative Method for Assessing Corporate Social and Economic Policy: Reproductive Approach
 
More details
Hide details
1
Kazan National Research Technological University, RUSSIA
2
Ulyanovsk State Agrarian University named after P.A. Stolypin, RUSSIA
3
Kuban State Agrarian University named after I. T. Trubilin, RUSSIA
4
Plekhanov Russian University of Economics, RUSSIA
5
Institute of Legislation and Comparative Law under the Government of the Russian Federation, RUSSIA
6
Moscow Witte University, RUSSIA
CORRESPONDING AUTHOR
Irina V. Zhukovskaya   

Department of Logistics and Management, Kazan National Research Technological University, Kazan, Russia
Online publish date: 2017-10-20
Publish date: 2017-10-20
 
Eurasian J Anal Chem 2017;12(Interdisciplinary Perspective on Sciences 7b):1441–1451
KEYWORDS
ABSTRACT
The urgency of the problem stated in the paper is due to the fact that a service enterprise employee’s qualitative and quantitative parameters have a major influence on the entity’s functioning nature, especially in terms of ensuring its stable and long-term sustainable development. The theoretical and practical significance of various scientists and scientific schools positions’ in-depth review on the problems under consideration seems topical. The purpose of the paper is to justify an innovative method for evaluating corporate social and economic policy from the standpoint of a reproductive approach adapted to the Russian economic reality conditions. The method of comparative analysis, generalization and systematization of facts, methods of factorial, graphical, financial analysis are used in the paper. The argument is built in the paper to support the human potential concept improvement, author’s theses are put forward on the innovative methods application in socio-economic policy, an algorithm for applying the innovative method with the calculated component is disclosed. The paper materials are of practical value for government bodies when developing and implementing federal and regional innovation development programs, developing innovative infrastructure, stimulating innovative activity.
 
REFERENCES (18)
1.
Etzkowitz, H. (2002). Incubation of incubators: innovation as a triple helix of university-industry government networks. Science and Public Policy, 29(2), 115–128.
 
2.
Leydesdorff, L. (2005). The triple helix model and the study of knowledge-based innovation systems. International Journal of Contemporary Sociology, 42, 1–16.
 
3.
Satinsky, D., & Botot, S. (2011). The model of the triple helix in the regional development of Great Britain, the USA and Russia. Innovations, 4, 43-46.
 
4.
Dezhina, I. G. (2013). Technological platforms and innovative clusters: together or separately? Moscow: Publishing house of Gaidar Institute.
 
5.
Dezhina, I. G., & Kiseleva, V. V. (2008). State, science and business in the innovative system of Russia. Moscow: IETP.
 
6.
Drobot, P. N., Drobot, D. A., & Uvarov, A. F. (2011). The prevailing role of universities in the triple helix model. Innovations, 4, 93-96.
 
7.
Shmatko, A. D. (2014). Small innovative enterprises development in academic institutions in conditions of technological platforms’ formation. Intellectual property. Industry. Scientific and practical journal, 8, 35-42.
 
8.
Zhukovskaya, I. V., Shinkevich, A. I., Ostanin, L. M., Yalunina, E. N., Lushchik, I. V., Zhukova, M. A., & Mokhova, G. V. (2016). Features of economic zones’ regulation in terms of economic instability. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 11(18), 12787-12801.
 
9.
Zhukovskaya, I. V. (2016). Technology Platforms as an Efficient Tool to Modernize Russia’s Economy. International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, 6(1), 163-168.
 
10.
Shinkevich, M. V., & Shinkevich, A. I. (2011). Institutionalization of sustainable innovative development of mesosystems: management models and technologies. Kazan: Kazan National Research Technological University.
 
11.
Sidorovich, A. V. (2011). Integration of science, education and industry: synergistic effect. Philosophy of Education, 1, 26-31.
 
12.
Porter, M. (1990). The Competitive Advantage of Nations. New York: The Free Press.
 
13.
Araslanova, A. A. (2011). Integration of Science, Education and Production: Synergetic Effect. Philosophy of Education, 1, 26-31.
 
14.
Druzhinina, S. V. (1991). Problems of integrating science and production in modern conditions. Bulletin of Leningrad University, 5, 111-113.
 
15.
Yudanov, A. Yu. (2013). Competition: theory and practice. Science and Public Policy, 29(2), 115-128.
 
16.
Katukov, D. D., Malygin, V. E., & Smorodinskaya, N. V. (2012). Institutional environment of the globalized economy: development of network interactions. Moscow: Institute of Economics, Russian Academy of Sciences.
 
17.
Galimulina, F. F., Zhukovskaya, I. V., Komissarova, I. P., Shinkevich, A. I., Mayorova, A. N., Astafyeva, I. A., Klimova, N. V., & Nabiullina, K. R. (2016). Technology Platforms as an Efficient Tool to Modernize Russia’s Economy. International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, 6(1), 163-168.
 
18.
Galimulina, F. F. (2014). Technological platforms as a way of minimizing institutional traps in the real sector of the economy. Economic Bulletin of the Republic of Tatarstan, 2, 54-58.
 
eISSN:1306-3057