Projecting and Implementation of Professional-Personal Environment for Future Teachers
More details
Hide details
Institute of Pedagogy, Psychology and Social Problems, RUSSIA
Volgograd State University, RUSSIA
Kazan State University of Architecture and Engineering, RUSSIA
Orenburg State Pedagogical University, RUSSIA
Moscow Region State University, RUSSIA
Ulyanovsk State Agrarian University named after P.A. Stolypin, RUSSIA
Rimma Kh. Gilmeeva   

Institute of Pedagogy, Psychology and Social Problems, Kazan, Russia
Online publish date: 2017-09-27
Publish date: 2017-09-27
Eurasian J Anal Chem 2017;12(Interdisciplinary Perspective on Sciences 7b):1059–1067
The development of modern education determines the vector of teacher professional and personal development capable of effective carrying out professional and pedagogical activities in favors of students, society and the state. Great opportunities to attain this goal are fold in teacher professional and personal environment, able of creating favorable conditions for this goal, organically combining the fundamentality of the teachers’ professional knowledge, the search for new practice-oriented forms and methods of their activity and professional and personal development. The basis for projecting the future teacher’s professional-personal educational environment is the project - target approach, determining the consideration of goals, content, technologies of education as a project of innovation activity. The authors developed a scheme for the projecting of the future teacher professional and personal environment and proposed a technological algorithm for its projecting, involving the stages of organization and functioning. A diagnostic toolkit providing the main criterion parameters’ assessment of a professional-personal environment is proposed.
1. Gushchina, T. N. (2011). The pedagogical essence of the phenomenon of “educational environment”: materials research Society. Environment. Development (Terra Humana), 4, 188-194.
2. Zair-Bek, E. S. (2011). The Concept of “educational environment of schools” and approaches to its assessment in modern studies. In the Issue. Offline, 11, 1683-1692.
3. Shapran, P. Y., & Shapran O. I. (2014). Educational environment of the University: typology, functions, structure. The Young scientist, 7, 881-885.
4. Yakupova, R. M. (2017). Fundamentals of Environmental Problem and Transformation of Scientific Knowledge in Environmental Knowledge. Man In India, 97(15), 313-330.
5. Baklashova, T. A., Galimova, E. G., & Baklashova, O. N. (2017). Social Capital of Educational Institution: Contemporary State, Features and Prospects for the Development. Man In India, 97(15), 227-241.
6. Gorbunova, N. V., & Sabirova, E. G. (2017). Pedagogical Design of Future Teachers’ Personal and Professional Route. Man In India, 97(14), 217-226.
7. Yasvin, V. A. (2001). Educational environment: from modeling to designing. Moscow: Meaning.
8. Song, T., Ustin, P. N., Popov, L. M., & Mudarisov, M. M. (2017). The Educational Technology of Ethical Development for Students. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 13(6), 2095-2110.
9. Cao, Y., Kurbanova, A. T., & Salikhova, N. R. (2017). Development of Classification Thinking in Future Teachers: Technologies of Reflective Discussion. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 13(6), 1865-1879.
10. Rubtsov, V. V., & Ivashina, T. G. (2002). Designing of the developing educational environment of the school. Moscow: Publishing house of MSUP.
11. Slobodchikov, V. I. (2000). About the concept of the educational environment in the concept of developing education. Moscow: Akopiants ROSS.
12. Alisov, E. A., & Podymova, L. S. (2001). Innovative educational environment as a factor of self-actualization of personality. Secondary professional education, 1, 61-63.
13. Merzon, E. E. (2011). Educational environment as the factor of formation of professional competence of students of pedagogical high school. Young scientist, 10(2), 170-172.
14. Shmeleva, E. A. (2012). Innovative educational environment of the University: a space of development. Scientific search, 1(3), 14-17.
15. Boyarov, E. N. (2014). Safe information educational environment of University: concept and components. Young scientist, 18(1), 20-23.
16. Prodiblokh, N. E. (2015). Innovative educational environment of the University. Bulletin of the Maykop state technological University, 3, 169-173.
17. Masalimova, A. R., Levina, E. Y., Platonova, R. I., Yakubenko, K. Yu., Mamitova, N. V., Arzumanova, L. L., Grebennikov, V. V., & Marchuk, N. N. (2017). Cognitive Simulation as Integrated Innovative Technology in Teaching of Social and Humanitarian Disciplines. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 13(8), 4915-4928.
18. Lukyanova, M. I. (2008). Organisation personal development in a professional environment. Рedagogy: history, theory, practice and trends, 2, Retrieved from
19. Gilmeeva, R. H. ,& Politkovskaya, L. G. (2015). Technological support of formation of the developing professional and personal environment of the teacher in primary school. Kazan pedagogical journal, 4(1), 22-25.
20. Novikov, V. N. (2012). Educational environment of the University as a professionally and personally stimulating factor. Psychological science and education, 1, 110-120.
21. Leont’eva, O. V. (2009). Cultural and educational environment of the University as psychological and pedagogical problem. Education and society, 6, 106-111.
22. Laktionova, E. B. (2010). Educational environment as condition of development of the personality and its region. Izvestiya RGPU im. A. I. Herzen, 128, 40-54.
23. Arendarchuk, I. V. (2014). Psychological risks of University educational environment. Izvestiya of Saratov University Acmeology of education. Developmental and educational psychology, 1(3), 48-53.
24. Guzeev, V. V. (2001). Theory and practice of integrated educational technologies. Moscow: Education.
25. Gilmeeva, R. H. (2015). Integrative model of implementation of the FSES in the process of humanitarian education on the basis of project-oriented approach. Vestnik of the Kazan state University of culture and arts, 2(1), 58-61.
26. Gilmeeva, R. H., & Muhametzyanova, L. Y. (2017). Technology of realization of FGOS SPO in humanitarian training on the basis of project-oriented approach. Kazan pedagogical journal, 3, 8-14.
27. Vilensky, V. Y., Obraztsov, P. I., & Uman, A. I. (2004). Technology of professionally oriented teaching at the higher school: Studies. the allowance. Moscow: Pedagogical society of Russia.
28. Mukhametzyanova, G. V. (2008). Project-oriented approach — the imperative of formation of professional competence. Higher education in Russia, 8, 104-110.
29. Golyshev, I. G. (2011). Design-oriented approach to managing the integration of vocational education and production in the region. Secondary professional education, 11, 7-10.
30. Serikov, V. V. (2003). Education and personality. Theory and practice of designing of pedagogical systems. Moscow: Logos.
31. Khutorskoy, A. V. (2006). The Design of a new content of education. School technologies, 2, 74-80.
32. Alekseev, N. G. (2002). Design and reflective thinking. Personality Development, 2, 92-115.
33. Nikitina, E. A. (2016). Subject, intelligence, technologies. Humanitarian Informatics, 11, 10-17.
34. Levina, E. Y., Akhmetov, L. G., Latipova, L. N., Mirzagitova, A. L., Mirzanagimova, F. I., Latipov, Z. A., & Masalimova, A. R. (2015), Diagnostics of Educational Activity Quality on the Basis of Qualitative Methods. Asian Social Science, 11(4), 246-251.
35. Bershadsky, M. E., Guzeev, V. V., & Nesterenko, A. A. (2010). Technological concept of effective learning. Education, 7, 110-117.
36. Valeeva, R. A., & Gafurov, I. R. (2017). Document Initial teacher education in Russia: connecting theory, practice and research. European Journal of Teacher Education, 40(3), 342-360.
37. Levina, E. Y., Masalimova, A. R., Kryukova, N. I., Grebennikov, V. V., Marchuk, N. N., Shirev, D. A., Renglikh, K. A., & Shagieva, R. V. (2017). Structure and Content of e-Learning Information Environment Based on Geo-Information Technologies. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 13(8), 5019-5031.
38. Kalimullin, A. M., & Utemov, V. V. (2017). Open Type Tasks as a Tool for Developing Creativity in Secondary School Students. Interchange, 48,129-144.
39. Gorbunova, N. V., & Mokeyeva, E. V. (2017). Innovative Educational Environment of Higher Educational Institution. Man In India, 97(15), 21-40.
40. Khrulyova, A. A., & Sakhieva, R. G. (2017). Forming of Informational Culture as a Necessary Condition of the Level Raising of Higher Education. Man In India, 97(15), 211-225.
41. Chen, F., Gorbunova, N. V., Masalimova, A. R., & Bírová, J. (2017). Formation of ICT-Competence of Future University School Teachers. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 13(8), 4765-4777.
42. Kong Y., Kayumova, L. R., & Zakirova, V. G. (2017). Simulation Technologies in Preparing Teachers to Deal with Risks. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 13(8), 4753-4763.
43. Kazakov, A. V., Zakirova, V. G., & Bírová, J. (2017). Modeling the Process of Forming Social and Cultural Competence among Students of Linguistics Faculty. Man In India, 97(14), 291-305.
44. Li, N., Pyrkova, K. V., & Ryabova, T. V. (2017). Teaching Communication Skills and Decision-Making to University Students. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 13(8), 4715-4723.
45. Kurbanov, R. A., Gurbanov, R. A., Belyalova, A. M., Maksimova, E. M., Leonteva, I. A., & Sharonov, I. A. (2017). Practical Advice for Teaching of University Students the Mechanisms of Self-Government of Safe Behavior. IEJME-Mathematics Education, 12(1), 35-42.