Prosecution and Defense in the Russian Criminal Process
More details
Hide details
Moscow State Institute of International Relations (University) of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Russian Federation (MGIMO-University), Moscow, RUSSIA
The Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration (Lipetsk Branch), Lipetsk, RUSSIA
Pitirim Sorokin Syktyvkar State University, Syktyvkar, RUSSIA
Publication date: 2018-12-19
Eurasian J Anal Chem 2018;13(New Science Methodology 1b):em83
The purpose of this study is to identify problems arising in the process of realizing the functions of prosecution and defense in criminal proceedings of the Russian Federation. The author analyzes the concept of “adversarial nature”. A direct relationship is established between the adversarial principle and the positions of prosecution and defense. The necessity of comprehensive improvement of the existing criminal procedure legislation is shown by creating an effective mechanism to protect the rights and interests of individuals and legal entities that suffered from illegal actions, as well as protecting a person from unlawful and unsubstantiated accusations, infringing his rights and freedoms. In a positive way, the similar experience of foreign countries is being investigated. Among the main findings outlined in this article, the following points are worth emphasizing: in the field of criminal justice, provisions of the Criminal Procedure Code and international regulatory legal acts should be provided in relation to the presentation of the initial charge in order to eliminate the negative consequences not only for the outcome of specific criminal cases, but also for law enforcement in the preliminary investigation process in general; the solution of the task of expanding the adversarial principle at the preliminary investigation stage should be based on the legislative abolition of the unilateral procedure for introducing the facts to the materials of the criminal case presented by the defense; a clear legal status of the parties of the defense and prosecution, provided by the law and the mechanism for its execution, takes criminal procedural relations to a new qualitative level, which positively affects the reputation of the social state.
The Constitution of the Russian Federation of December 12, 1993. Meeting of the legislation of the Russian Federation; 2014, 31. Art. 4398.
Amasyants AE. Criminal procedure problems of the adversarial principle in criminal proceedings. Eurasian Bar. 2013;2(3):42-45.
Chichkanov AB. The principle of adversarial proceedings in the Russian criminal proceedings. Jurisprudence. 2011;5:120-131.
Tarichko IU. Global trends in criminal process optimization. Actual problems of Russian law. 2015;12(61):11-177.
Dadonov SV. Implementation of the adversarial principle at the pretrial stages of the criminal process: dissertation for the degree of candidate of legal sciences. Moscow: Russian Customs Academy; 2003.
Isaeva RM. On the question of the existence of secrets of investigation in the Russian criminal process. Gaps in the Russian legislation. 2014;2:242-244.
Sails of the EB. Actual problems of ensuring the right to protection in the criminal process in Russia at the present stage. State and law in the XXI century. 2016;2:54-61.
Criminal Procedure Code of the Russian Federation of December 18, 2001 No. 174-ФЗ. Meeting of the legislation of the Russian Federation; 2001: 52 (Part I). Art. one.
Bufetova MSh. On the question of the evidentiary activities of the defender in the Russian criminal proceedings. Bulletin of the East-Siberian Institute of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia. 2018;2(85):64-70.
Kotlyarova MF. Actual problems of the institution of attracting a person as an accused in the criminal process in the Russian Federation. All-Russian scientific and practical journal “History, philosophy, economics and law”. 2014;4:36-39.
Gromov ON, Franciforov SE. Law enforcement activities of the preliminary investigation, prosecutors and courts. Moscow: Phoenix; 2010.
Makeeva IW. The relationship of the functions of the prosecution and defense in criminal proceedings. Gaps in the Russian legislation. Legal journal. 2017;2:253-255.
Uradov IL. Problems of the implementation of the rights of counsel in criminal proceedings. Leningrad Law Journal. 2015;3:159-163.
Resolution of the Plenum of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation of February 10, 2009 N. 1 “On the practice of the courts reviewing complaints in accordance with Article 125 of the Criminal Procedure Code of the Russian Federation”. Russian newspaper; 2009.