Three-Phase Wet Sour Gas Transmission in a Pipeline

Independent Researcher, Chemical Engineering, Iran.
Independent Researcher, Chemical Engineering & Gas Industries, Iran.
Eurasian J Anal Chem 2017;12(A Multidisciplinary Approach to science 5b):549–557
Online publish date: 2017-07-05
Publish date: 2017-07-05
The basis of a wet process scheme involves minimum offshore processing. The reservoir fluid is collected on a wellhead platform and routed without treatment via a three-phase subsea pipeline to the shore where it is processed to deliver gas and condensates at specifications. The concept and design will be applied to produce wet sour gas transmission from offshore to shore via a subsea pipeline, resulting in a lower capital investment. As a consequence two highly undesirable situations can exist at the same time, severe corrosion and hydrate blockage, leading to system failure and the complete shutdown of production. Therefore, both corrosion and hydrate inhibitors can be required to effectively treat these phenomena. A solution of monoethylene glycol (MEG) is used for hydrate prevention and an amine (methyldiethanolamine [MDEA]) will be added as a buffering agent to maintain pH at a neutralizing value to managed corrosion. This requires proper quality assurance of topside and subsea pipelines but will result in lower capital costs as well as lower operational costs. In the proposed “Three-Phase Wet Sour Gas Transmission in a Pipeline”, excellent engineering team will focus on the application of a pH control system for carbonate reservoirs in order to prevent scaling.
1. Zaghloul, J. (2006). “Multiphase Analysis of Three-Phase Flow (Gas-Condensate-Water) Flow in Pipes”, A Thesis in Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering, The Pennsylvania State University, December.
2. Dugstad, A., & Seiersten, M. (2003). “Flow Assurance of pH Stabilized Wet Gas Pipelines”, NACE-03314, CORROSION, 16-20 March, San Diego, California.
3. Christiansen, E H. (2012). “Rate of Hydrate Inhibitor in Long Subsea Pipeline”, NTNU-Trondheim, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, June 2012.
4. Veena, D. S., & Sanjay, J. D. (2017). Optimization of RP-HPLC Method for Simultaneous Estimation of Lamivudine and Raltegravir in Binary Mixture by Using Design of Experiment . Eurasian Journal of Analytical Chemistry, 12(3), 179-195. DOI: 10.12973/ejac.2017.00162a.
5. Halvorsen, A. M. K., & Andersen, T. R., (2007). “The Relationship Between Internal Corrosion Control Method, Scale Control And Meg Handling Of A Multiphase Carbon Steel Pipeline Carrying Wet Gas With CO2 and Cetic Acid”, NACE-07313, CORROSION, 11-15 March, Nashville, Tennessee.
6. Sachin, T. D., & Disha, M. D., Manish, A. K., & Debarshi, K. M. (2017). Development and Validation of a Novel Stability Indicating RP-HPLC Method. Eurasian Journal of Analytical Chemistry, 12(3), 223-235. DOI: 10.12973/ejac.2017.00165a.
7. Venketeswara, R., Vidyadhara, S., Sasidhar, RLC, Ganesh Kumar, T.N.V. & Rokiya, Md. (2016). A Novel Stability Indicating RP-HPLC Method Development and Validation for The Simultaneous Estimation of Losartan Potassium, Ramipril and Hydrochlorothiazide in Bulk and Pharmaceutical Dosage Form. Eurasian Journal of Analytical Chemistry, 11(5), 255-265 - DOI: 10.12973/ejac.2016.139a.
Copy url