Acute Changes in Quadriceps Flexibility: PNF Versus Static Stretch in Senior Athletes
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.53555/ejac.v20i1.1151Abstract
Background: Flexibility is a crucial component of physical fitness, particularly among senior athletes, as it influences performance, injury prevention, and rehabilitation. The quadriceps muscle plays a pivotal role in functional mobility, and its flexibility can be improved through different stretching techniques. While static stretching is widely used, Proprioceptive Neuromuscular Facilitation (PNF) stretching has been proposed as a more effective method for improving range of motion (ROM). However, limited research exists comparing the acute effects of these two methods in senior athletes.
Objective: This study aims to compare the acute effects of PNF stretching and static stretching on quadriceps flexibility in senior athletes. The study evaluates changes in ROM and perceived muscle tightness immediately following stretching interventions.
Methods: A randomized controlled trial was conducted with 60 senior athletes (aged 50 years and older). Participants were randomly assigned to either a PNF stretching group or a static stretching group. Quadriceps flexibility was assessed using a goniometer, and muscle tightness was evaluated using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS). The PNF group performed the hold-relax technique, while the static stretching group held a passive stretch for 30 seconds. Pre- and post-intervention measurements were analyzed using paired and independent t-tests.
Results: Both groups exhibited significant improvements in ROM and reductions in muscle tightness post-intervention (p < 0.001). However, the PNF group showed a significantly greater increase in ROM (mean improvement: 15.47°) compared to the static stretching group (mean improvement: 7.33°). Similarly, the PNF group experienced a larger reduction in muscle tightness (mean VAS reduction: 2.87) compared to the static stretching group (mean VAS reduction: 1.20). Cohen’s d effect size analysis indicated a large practical significance for both ROM and VAS improvements in the PNF group.
Conclusion: The results suggest that PNF stretching is more effective than static stretching in acutely increasing quadriceps flexibility and reducing muscle tightness in senior athletes. These findings support the integration of PNF stretching in athletic training and rehabilitation protocols to optimize performance and prevent musculoskeletal injuries. Future research should explore the long-term effects of PNF stretching on flexibility and functional performance in older adults.
References
Behm DG, Blazevich AJ, Kay AD, McHugh M. Acute effects of muscle stretching on physical performance, range of motion, and injury incidence in healthy active individuals: a systematic review. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2016;41(1):1-11.
Feland JB, Myrer JW, Merrill RM. Acute changes in hamstring flexibility: PNF versus static stretch in senior athletes. J Sport Rehabil. 2001;10(1):45-56.
Gajdosik RL. Passive extensibility of skeletal muscle: review of the literature with clinical implications. Clin Biomech. 2001;16(2):87-101.
Suetta C, Magnusson SP, Beyer N, Kjaer M. Effect of strength training on muscle function in elderly hospitalized patients. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2007;17(5):464-72.
Kay AD, Blazevich AJ. Effect of acute static stretch on maximal muscle performance: a systematic review. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2012;44(1):154-64.
Sharman MJ, Cresswell AG, Riek S. Proprioceptive Neuromuscular Facilitation Stretching. Sports Med. 2006;36(11):929-39.
Hindle KB, Whitcomb TJ, Briggs WO, Hong J. Proprioceptive Neuromuscular Facilitation (PNF): Its mechanisms and effects on range of motion and muscular function. J Hum Kinet. 2012;31:105-113.
Weppler CH, Magnusson SP. Increasing muscle extensibility: a matter of increasing length or modifying sensation? Phys Ther. 2010;90(3):438-449.
Magnusson SP, Simonsen EB, Aagaard P, Kjaer M. Biomechanical responses to repeated stretches in human hamstring muscle in vivo. Am J Sports Med. 1996;24(5):622-628.
Morse CI, Degens H, Seynnes OR, Maganaris CN, Jones DA. The acute effect of stretching on the passive stiffness of the human gastrocnemius muscle tendon unit. J Physiol. 2008;586(1):97-106.
Herbert RD, de Noronha M, Kamper SJ. Stretching to prevent or reduce muscle soreness after exercise. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011;7:CD004577.
Reid DA, McNair PJ. Effects of an acute static stretching session on balance and jump performance in athletes. J Strength Cond Res. 2010;24(12):3393-3398.
Klinge K, Magnusson SP, Simonsen EB, Aagaard P. Effects of strength training on muscle, tendon, and joint function in elderly men. J Appl Physiol. 1997;83(4):1277-1284.
Chaabene H, Behm DG, Negra Y, Granacher U. Acute effects of static stretching on muscle strength and power: an attempt to clarify previous caveats. Front Physiol. 2019;10:1468.
Suetta C, Aagaard P, Rosted A, Jakobsen AK, Duus B, Magnusson SP, Kjaer M. Training-induced changes in muscle function and morphology: are elderly individuals capable of responding to resistance training? J Appl Physiol. 2004;97(5):1950-1957.
Pacheco L, Balius R, Aliste L, Pujol M, Pedret C. The acute effects of different stretching exercises on jump performance. J Strength Cond Res. 2011;25(11):2991-2998.
Chaouachi A, Chamari K, Wong DP, Castagna C, Chaouachi M, Moussa-Chamari I, Behm DG. Stretching and injury prevention in soccer: a review of the literature. Strength Cond J. 2010;32(6):53-62.
Medeiros DM, Cini A, Sbruzzi G, Lima CS. Influence of static stretching on hamstring flexibility in healthy young adults: systematic review and meta-analysis. Physiother Theory Pract. 2016;32(6):438-445.
Konrad A, Tilp M. Increased range of motion after static stretching is not due to changes in muscle and tendon structures. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2014;24(1):e1-e7.
Opplert J, Babault N. Acute effects of dynamic stretching on muscle flexibility and performance: an analysis of the current literature. Sports Med. 2018;48(2):299-325.
